requestId:68499aba1cb451.78915834.
Hegel’s Chinese View and Contradictory——From the “Conference” from “The Philosophy of History” Author: Jay Chou (Associate Professor of the School of Literature and Doctor of History)
Source: Original published in “Zi Haifeng” Issue 1, 2009
Time: Confucius was the 28th Jiachen of the Pu month of Wuxu in the year 2569
Jiachen
Jesus July 11, 2018
Content summary:Hegel conducted an energy analysis of the entire world in his “Philosophy of History”. In his energy kingdom, China was placed first for discussion, meaning it was the highest-level existence in the energy kingdom. Hegel’s conclusion is that China has not yet touched on any energy-related matters. Behind this discussion are Hegel’s three hypotheses: the world is sensual; the world is evolved; unrestrained is good, and specialization is evil.
Keywords: Hegell China Energy
In “Philosophy of History”, Hegell made a concentrated discussion on the energy of China’s ethnic groups. The result of the discussion is the famous library software: “Everything that belongs to ‘energy’ is far away from them.” It is precisely this sentence that makes many Chinese intellectuals’ difficult, and it is like a sentence that sentenced China to death. [1]
So how did Hegel come up with this conclusion? Is his judgment accurate? Let’s follow Hegel’s Symposium to show its position.
1. Hegel’s comprehensive understanding of the essential characteristics of China
(I) The principle of “Quality and Integrity”
1. Hegel first saw a wide range of characteristics of the Eastern world: the Eastern world has a significant principle in terms of “morality”, which is “physicality”. [2](118) What does “the physical nature of morality” mean? This is “productThe regulations of virtue are manifested in various ‘laws’. ”[2] (118) is the internalization, legalization and physicalization of “morality”. “morality” is originally an internal thing and has the characteristics of being unrestrained. Once it is internalized and physicalized, it becomes a rigid and rigid thing. Therefore, the “willfulness of “morality” is fought againstinclusive network, and it is learned and in this physicality. ”[2](118) Not only is it “morality”, but everything that is internal like “morality”, such as “opinion”, “conscience”, formal “unrestrained”, etc., is no longer recognized, and they are all controlled by the external force of “law”. [2](118) The result of “morality” is the dissipation of internality. According to Hegel’s view, a healthy society should have two basic forces supported: the object of the subject (” , morality, etc.) and objective things (inside things such as “laws”). [2] (111) But the Eastern world completely expels the inner and subjective things through the principle of “physicality of morality”, leaving only one force and a will – the inner force – is influencing, and the inner will and force dissipates. “Although there is no shortage of will that can refer to moral actions, there is no will to act in these moral actions from the heart. ”[2](118) So can this kind of moral action that is not promoted by the inner “moral” will still guarantee its “moral” nature? Will it become something else? Hegel replied at another point, and we will say it later. [2](74).
Under the principle of “physicality”, things with inner nature cannot obtain their inner nature, and this In the generality of sex and we can call it “energy”. So, the conclusion is: in the Eastern world, “‘energy’ has not yet gained internality, so it has not deprived the energy state of ‘natural’ in general. ”[2](118, 119)
The result is that in the Eastern country, the inner and inner things, religion and the country, “the King of God.” If no one recognizes it, wait for someone to take it. The world is still mixed with the world’sto keep a month’s price. The “God” as the Orientals cannot realize it in the Eastern consciousness, and this “God” concept has progressed with a soul and reached a state of super flesh. It is this “God” concept that makes the “energy” of the Orientals exceed the constraints of “physical” or “decree”.When a party serves the decree, it is not only because of its inherently compulsiveness, but also to gain the recognition of the internal will. “When we serve, because everything we are prescribed to do is recognized by an internal sanction.” [2] (119) This involves the problem of “unrestricted” choice. When Easterners abide by their inner will and choose “serving”, they also imply that they can choose “rejection”. This is the unrestrainedness of “energy”, and it is also a characteristic that it should have. But in Eastern countries, the situation is different. Because there is no unrestrained choice except internality, or perhaps no choice is made. “The ‘decree’ is seen there as naturally and absolutely good, and it is not expected that there is a lack of such subjective recognition. Orientals do not recognize their own will in the decree, and the young actress is the heroine. The heroine in the story recognizes a completely unfamiliar will in this drama.” [2] (119) This unfamiliar will is the moral entity that is unfamiliar to the inner nature.
In this moral entity, people who fall to the inner nature must serve a unique authority, that is, their heads of state. The head of state became the symbol of that body, and he was in the supreme position as the chief master. Everything belongs to him, and no one else exists alone. All the imagination and natural riches are occupied by this reality, and the unrestrained view is buried in it. In front of this unique power, nothing can maintain an independent preservation. [2] (112) Under the political situation of this master-general, the political situation shared by the Eastern countries was born – “the power-controlled government”.
(II) China – The God-Telebratory Government
The concept of “The God-Telebratory Government” seems to confuse us. Since there is no more than existence and only the absolute law is left, it is difficult to say that it is “specialized”, but where is the “god authority” that is inclusive? In the eyes of Hacking Baobao.comGer, China is a state of master-general. “In China, the emperor seems to be the chief of master, with the highest position. The national laws are etiquettes and the other is the provision of morality. … Since the moral laws are regarded as legislative regulations, and the laws themselves have a meritorious form, the scope of internal nature cannot be as mature as in China. Everything we call internal nature is concentrated on the head of state, thisThe Head of State takes care of the whole health, wealth and welfare from his legislation. ”[1] (119, 120) The fundamental basis of the rule of the chief master is the family, and its “ultimate ‘energy’ of the old and unchanging ‘energy’” is the “energy of the family”, [1] (126) “The characteristic of the country is the object-oriented ‘family contribution’. ”[2] (127) Filial piety and brotherhood in the family is a natural virtue, and it is also a religious virtue. The family has not yet been separated from religion. This is a ruled situation based on the chief of the master. href=”https://sites.google.com/view/sugarpapa”>Finishing a monthly price is “the sentiment of divine politics”, and the head of state is also a priest. [2] (62, 45) It seems that it is not that there is no “extraordinary existence”, but that it has been suppressed to live the vulgar level, and religion and the country are mixed together.
Herghel discusses China from five aspects: family relations, political theory, legal system, religion, and science. Characteristics of the God-controlled government.
(1) Family relations. In the family, Chinese people do not have independent personalities, as long as they are blood-related and natural relations. The family’s duties are absolutely binding and are ordered and regulated by laws. . These duties are from bottom to top, and rarely from top to bottom. The foundation of this family is also the foundation of “the law”. The emperor exercises his duties like a serious father. He is the chief master, and the people must respect him at the beginning. He is the supreme in religious affairs and academic affairs. But even His position is so noble that he is also restricted from exercising his personal wi
發佈留言